On Mon, Feb 27, 2006, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 02:18:44AM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 10:57:49PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > > The email:
> > >
> > > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0312.2/1024.html
> > >
> > > contains a full and clear explaination of the situation. The second
> > > paragraph of that email is key to understanding the problem and makes
> > > it absolutely clear what is trying to be decompressed as the initrd
> > > (the corrupted compressed piggy).
> >
> > FWIW, I didn't it either. "Work around broken boot firmware which passes
> > invalid initrd to kernel" would have been a simpler description.
>
> Sigh, I'm sick of this crap. I'm not going to debate it any further.
>
> > I agree that it would be nice if inflate.c would fail gracefully
> > instead of halting,
>
> IT _DOES_ FAIL GRACEFULLY TODAY. WITH MATT'S PATCHES, IT _DOESN'T_.
> THAT'S A REGRESSION. WHAT IS IT ABOUT THAT WHICH PEOPLE DON'T
> UNDERSTAND? DO I HAVE TO SPELL IT OUT IN ONE SYLLABLE WORDS?
I got that already, no need to shout. I just wanted to point
out that from the information you provided so far it
looks like your problem could be fixed in a more straight
forward fashion.
Problem: Boot firmware passes invalid arguments.
Solution: Ignore invalid boot firmware arguments.
> > but why can't you just use CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=n?
>
> Because you might want to use an initrd for real (for installation
> purposes) and therefore distributions (eg Debian) want it turned on?
If you use a distribution kernel which contains one, you
could simply add "noinitrd" to the kernel command line
to ignore it, no?
> Okay, this does it - I'm ignoring further discussion on this stupid
> idiotic topic which is soo bloody difficult for others to understand.
I don't understand your aggressiveness, there must be a dark
secret behind all this. Or maybe it's just the season
for flame wars.
I'm sorry to have bothered you,
Johannes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]