> well you assume you CAN walk all tasks... which is something afaik > that's being deprecated ;) > Thanks for clarifying that. We will need to revisit this function as a result of the proposed changes (when they happen). Balbir - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [Patch 0/7] Per-task delay accounting
- From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
- [Patch 4/7] Add sysctl for delay accounting
- From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch 4/7] Add sysctl for delay accounting
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch 4/7] Add sysctl for delay accounting
- From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch 4/7] Add sysctl for delay accounting
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch 4/7] Add sysctl for delay accounting
- From: Dipankar Sarma <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch 4/7] Add sysctl for delay accounting
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 4/7] Add sysctl for delay accounting
- From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 4/7] Add sysctl for delay accounting
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- [Patch 0/7] Per-task delay accounting
- Prev by Date: [PATCH][take2][2/2] kprobe: kprobe-booster against 2.6.16-rc5 for i386
- Next by Date: NPF functional API for Linux
- Previous by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 4/7] Add sysctl for delay accounting
- Next by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 4/7] Add sysctl for delay accounting
- Index(es):
 |