On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 22:32 +0000, Nix wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Al Viro moaned:
> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 09:46:32PM +0000, Nix wrote:
> >> (i.e., there's a reason that warning uses the word *might*.)
> >
> > The bug is in spewing tons of false positives, reducing S/N on that
> > warning to nearly useless level. Note that in this case actually
> > missing some would be more useful if what remains is less diluted
> > by crap.
>
> I think this might be <http://gcc.gnu.org/PR5035>.
>
Al posted a quite compelling analysis of this bug a while back that's
much better than anything in that bug report, of course I can't find it
right now.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
