Re: Building 100 kernels; we suck at dependencies and drown in warnings

El Sun, 26 Feb 2006 19:45:52 +0100,
"Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]> escribió:

> no tricky Makefile hackery there, just a little shell scripting magic.

Oh sure but "make compiletest" looked nicer ;) 

the compile statistics (http://developer.osdl.org/cherry/compile/)
were also nice, it's a shame it's not updated
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Building 100 kernels; we suck at dependencies and drown in warnings
  - From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
- Re: Building 100 kernels; we suck at dependencies and drown in warnings
  - From: Diego Calleja <[email protected]>
- Re: Building 100 kernels; we suck at dependencies and drown in warnings
  - From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] silence gcc warning about possibly uninitialized use of variable in scsi_scan
Next by Date: [PATCH] shmem: inline to avoid warning
Previous by thread: Re: Building 100 kernels; we suck at dependencies and drown in warnings
Next by thread: Re: Building 100 kernels; we suck at dependencies and drown in warnings
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]