Re: OOM-killer too aggressive?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chuck Ebbert wrote:
DMA free:44kB min:32kB low:40kB high:48kB active:0kB inactive:0kB
present:15728kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? yes

I think the big question is who used up all the DMA zone.. Surely not the floppy driver..

So it will try to allocate half its first request if that fails, then
fall back to non-DMA memory as a last resort, but doesn't get a chance
because the OOM killer gets invoked.  Maybe we need a new flag that says
"fail me immediately if no memory available"?

I think __GFP_NORETRY already does this.. There is also __GFP_NOWARN which suppresses the allocation failure warning, not sure if we want that or not..

--
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from [email protected]
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux