James Bottomley wrote: ...
how about this for the actual patch (for 2.6.16) ... I put two more tidy ups into it ...
...
+#define SD_BUF_SIZE 512
Thanks.Believe it or not, I was actually about to follow up with something like this. :-)
-- Stefan Richter -=====-=-==- --=- ==-=- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 1/2] sd: fix memory corruption by sd_read_cache_type
- From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
- Re: [stable] [PATCH 1/2] sd: fix memory corruption by sd_read_cache_type
- From: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
- Re: [stable] [PATCH 1/2] sd: fix memory corruption by sd_read_cache_type
- From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
- Re: [stable] [PATCH 1/2] sd: fix memory corruption by sd_read_cache_type
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Re: [stable] [PATCH 1/2] sd: fix memory corruption by sd_read_cache_type
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
- Re: [stable] [PATCH 1/2] sd: fix memory corruption by sd_read_cache_type
- From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
- Re: [stable] [PATCH 1/2] sd: fix memory corruption by sd_read_cache_type
- From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
- [PATCH 1/2] sd: fix memory corruption by sd_read_cache_type
- Prev by Date: Building 100 kernels; we suck at dependencies and drown in warnings
- Next by Date: Re: Building 100 kernels; we suck at dependencies and drown in warnings
- Previous by thread: Re: [stable] [PATCH 1/2] sd: fix memory corruption by sd_read_cache_type
- Next by thread: [PATCH 2.6.15.4 update] sd: fix memory corruption with broken mode page headers
- Index(es):
 |