On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 03:39:50AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Any chance we could get 'git fetch --heads' ?
>
> FWIW, I regularly blow away and create new heads, so the above is rather
> long for people who use my repos. A lot of them use rsync because when
> you're tracking a repo with ever-changing branches, 'git pull' doesn't
> really approximate "make local X look like remote X".
Speaking of which... Shouldn't git clone bring in .git/HEAD for rsync:// URLs?
As it is, we end up with HEAD pointing to refs/master, which might simply
not be there. For git:// we get .git/HEAD same as in remote repository,
so behaviour for rsync:// probably should be the same...
Looks like a missing rsync in git-clone, around
rsync://*)
rsync $quiet -av --ignore-existing \
--exclude info "$repo/objects/" "$GIT_DIR/objects/" &&
rsync $quiet -av --ignore-existing \
--exclude info "$repo/refs/" "$GIT_DIR/refs/" || exit
Comments?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]