On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 09:11:08AM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Al Viro wrote:
> >Speaking of sbp2 problems... Why the _hell_ are we blacklisting on
> >firmware revision alone? Especially with entries like "all firmware
> >with 2.<whatever> as version is broken"...
>
> The firmware_revision CSR key value has so far been a good method to
> guesstimate the bridge chip. I don't know a better one.
Umm... What about ->vendor_name_kv (plus firmware_revision, obviously)?
> I posted an improved blacklisting patch a few days ago. Among other
> small cleanups, I removed skip_ms_page_8 from the Initio blacklist entry.
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux1394-devel&m=114065678722190
FWIW, that puppy appears to live just fine without forcing 36byte
inquiry here...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
