Re: [PATCH] slab: Don't scan cache_cache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> > From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
> > 
> > The cache_cache object cache is used for bootstrapping, but the cache is
> > essentially static. It is unlikely that we ever have more than one page
> > allocated for it. As SLAB_NO_REAP is gone now, fix a regression by skipping
> > cache_cache explicitly in cache_reap().

On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 08:16 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> There are other essentially static caches as well. Could we have something 
> more general?
> 
> Are you really seeing any measurable regression?

I haven't measured it but it seems obvious enough that especially for
low end boxes. I don't think something more general is required because
other static caches should use kmalloc() instead.

			Pekka

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux