Justin Piszcz wrote:
Second patch fails for me.
..
Should I be using 2.6.16-rcX?
Mmm... that's what I'm using (plus other patches), so, yes.. give that a try. 2.6.16 does seem to be shaping up to be a nice kernel. Cheers - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: David Greaves <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- References:
- LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: David Greaves <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: David Greaves <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
- LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Prev by Date: Re: Mapping to 0x0
- Next by Date: [PATCH] fix 'defined but not used' warning in net/rxrpc/main.c::rxrpc_initialise
- Previous by thread: Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Next by thread: Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
- Index(es):
 |