>
>Now let us say I am creating sort of a virtual text file (code.js)
>that is a live-concatenation of these files:
># concatenate tooltip.js banner.js foo.js code.js
>
>Note I am not talking about the cat(1) utility. I am thinking of
>code.js be always a live concatenated version of these three, so when
>I modify one file, the live-version is also modified.
>
>What puprose I might have? Network-related. Say, I have an HTML file
>that includes these three files in its code.
>
Try FUSE.
>If I had a live-concatenated file, I could reference it in the HTML file
>so that the browser does not have to download three files but just one.
>
>This would surely reduce network overhead of downloading the same amount
>of data but within just one connection, reduce resource usage on the client
>and possibly (depending on implementation) reduce the cost of accessing
>three individual files on the server.
>
Have you ever heard of persistent connections with HTTP/1.1?
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
