On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 01:53:26PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Doesn't less heat imply less power consumption?
> >
> > Not in this case no.
> >...
>
> Sorry for the dumb question, but how could this work physically?
>
> If a computer produces less heat with the same power consumption, what
> happens with the other energy?
No. Let's do the math (again), and (again) for the actual values of an Intel
Pentium(R) M Processor, 1400 MHz @ 1.484 V, even though the same rules of
physics, logic and mathematics apply to _all_ processors.
Power consumption in idle state C2 (Stop-Grant state) 7.3 W
Power consumption when "skipping instructions"
because of throttling (Stop-Grant state) 7.3 W
Power consumption when doing work 22.0 W
This means that if the processor idle percentage is _larger_ than (1 -
throttling rate), throttling has no effect at all.
Now, let's assume there is some work for the CPU to do which keeps it busy
for one second @ 1.4 GHz. How much energy is needed to get this work done?
0% throttling: 22 Ws (1s)
25% throttling: 24 Ws (1.3s)
50% throttling: 29 Ws (2s)
75% throttling: 44 Ws (4s)
Now let's also assume there is nothing else to do during a span of four
seconds: then, independent of the throttling setting, the CPU power
consumption is 44 Ws for these four seconds.
However: for the 75% throttling state, the CPU only produces 11 W of heat
_all the time_ -- this means, the fan or air conditioning must only consider
11 W. For 0%, the CPU may produce 44 W of heat in a second -- and to cool
that sufficiently, the fan _may_ need to run faster, which consumes more
energy than is saved by only having to cool 7.3 W (instead of 11W) the other
three seconds.
So: P4-clockmod style throttling only makes sense if either
a) the idle handler does not enter the Stop-Grant state (C2) efficiently, or
b) the load varies significantly over time in a manner which has effect on
the fan, and where the latency induced by throttling doesn't matter.
Dominik
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]