Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)

Hi!

> > We are trying to catch a bug here. suspend2 or not, it is a bug and it
> > should be fixed (or at least understood).
> >
> > [Also please try to tone down your messages. Your suspend2 may be more
> > user-friendly, you do not want to start that flamewar again, do you?
> > Saying "don't bother fixing that" is not nice thing to do.]
> 
> What's the bug?

shrink_all_memory() returns zero, even throught there are still pages
freeable.
								Pavel
-- 
Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Looking for a file monitor
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix next_timer_interrupt() for hrtimer
• Previous by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
• Next by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]