Re: [PATCH 3/4] cleanup __exit_signal()

["Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>]

On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:13:22PM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:04:03PM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > This patch factors out duplicated code under 'if' branches.
> > > Also, BUG_ON() conversions and whitespace cleanups.
> > 
> > Passed steamroller.  Looks sane to me.
> 
> Oh, thanks!
> 
> I forgot to say it, but I had run steamroller tests too before I
> sent "some tasklist_lock removals" series.

Glad to hear it!

> Do you know any other test which may be useful too?

Matt Wilcox mentioned that a full build of gdb ran some tests that do
a good job of exercising signals.  I have not yet tried this myself
(but am giving it a shot).

Also, my guess is that you ran steamroller on x86 (how many CPUs?).
I ran on ppc64.

						Thanx, Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/