Re: [PATCH 12/13] "const static" vs "static const" in nfs4

On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 12:01:32AM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> No need for that. It's just something that ICC complains about
> "storage class not being first" - gcc doesn't care.

Neither does C99, so ICC really should either STFU or make that warning
independent from the rest and possible to turn off...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 12/13] "const static" vs "static const" in nfs4
    • From: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 12/13] "const static" vs "static const" in nfs4
    • From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 12/13] "const static" vs "static const" in nfs4
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 12/13] "const static" vs "static const" in nfs4
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 12/13] "const static" vs "static const" in nfs4
    • From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
• Next by Date: Re: Problems for IBM x440 in 2.6.16-rc4-mm1 and -mm2 (PCI?)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 12/13] "const static" vs "static const" in nfs4
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 12/13] "const static" vs "static const" in nfs4
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]