Re: Patch to make the head.S-must-be-first-in-vmlinux order explicit

On Friday 24 February 2006 14:53, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
 
> I've looked some yesterday at generating this at runtime, and haven't 
> found a clean enough solution yet (esp one that doesn't break kdump); 
> I'll keep poking at it for a bit more though....


Ok if it's too complicated we can force it first.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Patch to make the head.S-must-be-first-in-vmlinux order explicit
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: Patch to make the head.S-must-be-first-in-vmlinux order explicit
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: Patch to make the head.S-must-be-first-in-vmlinux order explicit
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [patch 1/1] cpufreq_conservative: percpu adjustments
Next by Date: Re: Patch to reorder functions in the vmlinux to a defined order
Previous by thread: Re: Patch to make the head.S-must-be-first-in-vmlinux order explicit
Next by thread: Patch to reorder functions in the vmlinux to a defined order
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]