Re: Patch to make the head.S-must-be-first-in-vmlinux order explicit

On Friday 24 February 2006 14:53, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
 
> I've looked some yesterday at generating this at runtime, and haven't 
> found a clean enough solution yet (esp one that doesn't break kdump); 
> I'll keep poking at it for a bit more though....


Ok if it's too complicated we can force it first.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Patch to make the head.S-must-be-first-in-vmlinux order explicit
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: Patch to make the head.S-must-be-first-in-vmlinux order explicit
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: Patch to make the head.S-must-be-first-in-vmlinux order explicit
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [patch 1/1] cpufreq_conservative: percpu adjustments
• Next by Date: Re: Patch to reorder functions in the vmlinux to a defined order
• Previous by thread: Re: Patch to make the head.S-must-be-first-in-vmlinux order explicit
• Next by thread: Patch to reorder functions in the vmlinux to a defined order
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]