Trond Myklebust <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 15:35 -0500, Bryan Fink wrote:
> > Hi All. I'm running into a bit of trouble with NFS on 2.6. I see that
> > at least Trond thought, mid-January, that "The readahead algorithm has
> > been broken in 2.6.x for at least the past 6 months." (
> > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0601.2/0559.html) Anyone
> > know if that has been fixed?
>
> No it hasn't been fixed. ...and no, this is not a problem that only
> affects NFS: it just happens to give a more noticeable performance
> impact due to the larger latency of NFS over a 100Mbps link.
iirc, last time we went round this loop Ram and I were unable to reproduce it.
Does anyone have a testcase?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
