Re: [PATCH] softlockup detection vs. cpu hotplug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 08:31 +0800, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> 
> In the watchdog thread, do touch_softlockup_watchdog in a 
> non-preemptible section so that it won't touch another cpu's 
> timestamp.  This can happen in the window between the watchdog thread 
> getting forcefully migrated during a cpu offline operation and 
> kthread_should_stop.
Could we stop the thread in CPU_DOWN_PREPARE case, so it will not be
migrated to other CPUs? I suppose it's better the per-cpu thread only
runs on the specific cpu.

Thanks,
Shaohua

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux