* Nish Aravamudan <nish.aravamudan@gmail.com> wrote: > Would it make more sense to compare 2.6.15 and 2.6.15-rt17, as opposed > to 2.6.12-1.1390_FC4 and 2.6.15-rt17? Seems like the closer the two > kernels are, the easier it will be to isolate the differences. good point. I'd expect there to be similar 'top' output, but still worth doing for comparable results. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ~5x greater CPU load for a networked application when using 2.6.15-rt15-smp vs. 2.6.12-1.1390_FC4
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
- Re: ~5x greater CPU load for a networked application when using 2.6.15-rt15-smp vs. 2.6.12-1.1390_FC4
- From: "Nish Aravamudan" <nish.aravamudan@gmail.com>
- Re: ~5x greater CPU load for a networked application when using 2.6.15-rt15-smp vs. 2.6.12-1.1390_FC4
- References:
- ~5x greater CPU load for a networked application when using 2.6.15-rt15-smp vs. 2.6.12-1.1390_FC4
- From: Gautam H Thaker <gthaker@atl.lmco.com>
- Re: ~5x greater CPU load for a networked application when using 2.6.15-rt15-smp vs. 2.6.12-1.1390_FC4
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: ~5x greater CPU load for a networked application when using 2.6.15-rt15-smp vs. 2.6.12-1.1390_FC4
- From: "Nish Aravamudan" <nish.aravamudan@gmail.com>
- ~5x greater CPU load for a networked application when using 2.6.15-rt15-smp vs. 2.6.12-1.1390_FC4
- Prev by Date: Re: MD Raid 6: poor algorithm choice?
- Next by Date: Re: [Patch 3/3] prepopulate/cache cleared pages
- Previous by thread: Re: ~5x greater CPU load for a networked application when using 2.6.15-rt15-smp vs. 2.6.12-1.1390_FC4
- Next by thread: Re: ~5x greater CPU load for a networked application when using 2.6.15-rt15-smp vs. 2.6.12-1.1390_FC4
- Index(es):
 |