Re: slab: Remove SLAB_NO_REAP option

On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:

> OR, introduce smartness in cache_reap to break the loop earlier if we can
> somehow dynamically recognise the cache is static. 

Right. One could inspect the sizes of the caches without taking the locks 
before committing to a real inspection under lock.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: slab: Remove SLAB_NO_REAP option
    • From: Alok Kataria <[email protected]>
  • Re: slab: Remove SLAB_NO_REAP option
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: slab: Remove SLAB_NO_REAP option
    • From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>
  • Re: slab: Remove SLAB_NO_REAP option
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: slab: Remove SLAB_NO_REAP option
    • From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
  • Re: slab: Remove SLAB_NO_REAP option
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: slab: Remove SLAB_NO_REAP option
    • From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Patch to reorder functions in the vmlinux to a defined order
• Next by Date: Re: Patch to reorder functions in the vmlinux to a defined order
• Previous by thread: Re: slab: Remove SLAB_NO_REAP option
• Next by thread: Re: slab: Remove SLAB_NO_REAP option
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]