Re: sys_mmap2 on different architectures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 04:43:47PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:

Aha, that part I didn't catch.  Thanks for the clarification
Ben.

I wonder why we did things that way with a fixed shift...


Without that trick, we'd have needed an extra parameter for the syscall on x86, which is already at the maximum number of registers with 6 arguments. This was easier than changing the syscall ABI. =-)


Well, there is always the trick of making it a pointer. It was needed for pselect() anyway. A real sys_mmap64 would definitely have been cleaner, and will be needed to deal with the 16 TB barrier anyway :)

I personally think the S390 people had the right idea... once you run out of registers, just make it a defined part of the ABI that we pass in a single pointer to all the arguments.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux