KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > It's confusing and asymmetric. If you have time, it would be nice to later
> > remove for_each_pgdat() and for_each_cpu() from the kernel altogether, use
> > for_each_online_cpu(), for_each_possible_cpu(), for_each_online_node(),
> > for_each_possible_node().
> >
> Okay, I'll rewrite my patch and post new one which represents what you mention.
Well, only do that if it's appropriate to the context of that patch.
I was more thinking that this renaming would be a separate exercise, to be
done once things in that area calm down a bit.
> BTW, I noticed refine-for_each_pgdat-remove-pgdat-sorting.patch
> contains bug. (caller of ia64's insert_pgdat() is not removed...)
>
> so please drop them :(, I'll post new ones to next -mm (with enough test...).
OK..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
