Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote: > > For example, say that you have more than just a couple of disks attached > to the system, but many of them are for non-critical stuff. You do not > necessarily want to wait for them all to spin up at all. You usually only > care about one of them - the root device. Well yes, but I was suggesting that userspace be given the option - run insmod asynchronously if it's a problem. It all does indicate that our single module_init(no args) interface is too coarse... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Joel Becker <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Gabor Gombas <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Joel Becker <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- Index(es):