On Monday 06 February 2006 09:51, Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
> Reposting this patch that I'd submitted back on 1/26. Any thoughts on
> the basic approach in addition to the code itself? Is it possible to
> get this applied? Note that this should have negligible effect on
> those not configuring remote rcu callback processing.
Aside from the possible race we talked about in __rcu_process_callbacks, I
don't have huge objections here. But if the underlying problem is the cost
of kmem_cache_free, would it be better to limit that instead of trying to
push the latency around to specific cpus?
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
