On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 05:51:31PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > What got broken? Code that used to assume that sd.c will never, ever handle > openly RBC disks. As long as that remained true, userland could assume that > "sd fodder" and "has type 0" were the same. Which was never guaranteed. sd also has been handling TYPE_MOD forever, which HAL still doesn't deal with. Not that it should care at all about the scsi command type as you mentioned.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- References:
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.Helsinki.FI>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@suse.de>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: David Zeuthen <david@fubar.dk>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] netdev/uevent
- Next by Date: Re: Kernel thread removal
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- Index(es):
![]() |