Re: [PATCH 2/3] sysfs representation of stacked devices (dm) (rev.2)

Hi,

Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> This patch needs splitting up so that independent changes can be
> considered separately.
>
> c.f. The proposal from Mike Anderson (repeated below) which I prefer
> because it makes it clear that a table always belongs to exactly one md.

I like his proposed patch.
The interface is useful for my purpose too and moving table
creation inside _hash_lock means I don't need dm_get() neither.

Is it going to be pushed to upstream?
I'll remake my patch based on it.

--
Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Solutions (America), Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] sysfs representation of stacked devices (dm) (rev.2)
    • From: Alasdair G Kergon <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/3] sysfs representation of stacked devices (dm/md) (rev.2)
    • From: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 2/3] sysfs representation of stacked devices (dm) (rev.2)
    • From: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] sysfs representation of stacked devices (dm) (rev.2)
    • From: Alasdair G Kergon <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
• Next by Date: Re: lsscsi-0.17 released
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sysfs representation of stacked devices (dm) (rev.2)
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sysfs representation of stacked devices (dm) (rev.2)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]