El Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:18:22 -0500, David Zeuthen <[email protected]> escribió: > But I realize these changes are important because it's progress and back > in 2.6.0 things were horribly broken for at least desktop workloads [1]. As long as those changes don't come suddenly in the night, without a transition period... Check for Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt for some examples of how to deprecate userland interfaces properly. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Linux 2.6.16-rc4
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: "Pekka Enberg" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- From: David Zeuthen <[email protected]>
- Linux 2.6.16-rc4
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.16-rc4: known regressions
- Index(es):
 |