On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:46:01AM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> > you'd see in the relevant
> > standards what scsi device types exist, or even better stop relying
> > on such low-level knowledge.
>
> Then don't export it unless it's useful. You did break ABI, don't try to
> make up stupid excuses.
It's _not_ and abi break. TYPE_RBC is a valid scsi disk device that could
happen on any SAM transport, not just firewire. That sbp2 altered the
device type just papered over the crappy hal code as long as none of your
users had one of the non-firewire rbc devices.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
