On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:27:16AM -0500, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> Matthias Andree wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> >>Matthias Andree wrote:
> >>>Does this work around new incompatibilities in the kernel
> >>>or does this fix lsscsi bugs?
> >>
> >>The former. In lk 2.6.16-rc1 the
> >>/sys/class/scsi_device/<hcil>/device/block symlink
> >>changed to ".../block:sd<x>" breaking lsscsi 0.16 (and
> >>earlier) and sg_map26 (in sg3_utils).
> >
> > Heck, what was the reason for breaking userspace again?
>
> Maybe the person responsible can answer. I'm only reacting
> to a change that broke two of my utilities.
Probably better to cc the person responsible if you want an answer.
> > Why would someone even consider using sysfs at all if it changes
> > incompatibly?
>
> Indeed.
There seems to be no committment to making sysfs a stable part of the
kernel API. Which is really just another way of saying "we can't be
bothered to design it upfront, we'll just let it evolve into a mess
and then try to fix it afterwards".
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
