Re: 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable

Andrew Morton wrote:

Mark Lord <[email protected]> wrote:

For the past week, I've been trying to keep with the latest -rc*-git*
releases of 2.6.16 on my notebook, and something new in those is
impacting resume-from-RAM.

Mmm.. working 100% now with Randy Dunlop's ACPI additions from here:

    http://www.xenotime.net/linux/SATA/2.6.16-rc3/

Note that these are the latest evolution from a simpler patch by Jens
which I first started using in *spring 2005* to get suspend/resume working.

Are we *ever* going to add these to mainstream?
It's been almost a friggin' year!

Cheers

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable
    • From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable
    • From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
  • Re: 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
• Next by Date: [PATCH] netdev/uevent
• Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable
• Next by thread: Re: 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]