Re: [RFC][PATCH 04/20] pspace: Allow multiple instaces of the process id namespace

[Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>]

On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 07:29:17PM +0300, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
>>>I would prefer:
>>>- sys_ns_create()
>>> creates namespace and makes a task to inherit this namespace. 
>>> If _needed_, it _can_ fork inside.

>>I don't see why not have both, the auto-created
>>*space on clone() and the ability to create empty
>>*spaces which can be populated and/or entered
>Can you give more details on what you mean by auto-created *space and 
>empty *space?
>I see no much difference...

good, in this case we can drop the empty/standalone
*space and 'just' use the clone() one. glad that
we finally agree here ....

>>>- sys_ns_inherit()
>>> change active namespace.
>>hmm, sounds like a misnomer to me ...
>sys_ns_change ? :)

personally I prefer to see it as either enter or
move, but change is probably fine too (except for
the fact that it doesn't change the namespace)

>>>But how should we reference namespace? by globabl ID?
>>definitely by some system-unique identifier ...
>Should it be integer or path as Eric proposes?
IMHO the pointer would be sufficient, of course
this can be mapped to arbitrary names/int/etc ...

> Thanks,
> Kirill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/