Re: [PATCH] sched: Consolidated and improved smpnice patch

On Tuesday 21 February 2006 17:21, Peter Williams wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Would be just a matter of using task_timeslice(p) and making it
> > proportional to some baseline ensuring the baseline works at any HZ.
>
> How does the attached patch grab you?  It's independent of HZ.

Looks good thanks.

Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Consolidated and improved smpnice patch
  - From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] sched: Consolidated and improved smpnice patch
  - From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Consolidated and improved smpnice patch
  - From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Consolidated and improved smpnice patch
  - From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] iptables 32bit compat layer
Next by Date: Re: softlockup interaction with slow consoles
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: Consolidated and improved smpnice patch
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: Consolidated and improved smpnice patch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]