Re: [PATCH] sched: Consolidated and improved smpnice patch

On Tuesday 21 February 2006 17:21, Peter Williams wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Would be just a matter of using task_timeslice(p) and making it
> > proportional to some baseline ensuring the baseline works at any HZ.
>
> How does the attached patch grab you?  It's independent of HZ.

Looks good thanks.

Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Consolidated and improved smpnice patch
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] sched: Consolidated and improved smpnice patch
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Consolidated and improved smpnice patch
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: Consolidated and improved smpnice patch
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] iptables 32bit compat layer
• Next by Date: Re: softlockup interaction with slow consoles
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: Consolidated and improved smpnice patch
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: Consolidated and improved smpnice patch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]