On Út 21-02-06 06:44:34, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tuesday 21 February 2006 06:08, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Maybe you feel you are in a power position because your code happened
> > > to enter the kernel first, so you few you can have veto power over all
> > > other contenders. It sometimes works that way, but only up to a
> >
> > Unfortunately, I do not need to veto suspend2. It is so complex that
> > it vetoes itself. Last time akpm stopped it, IIRC.
>
> I'm going to let most of the last 8 hours' emails float by without reply, but
> think I should comment here.
Thanks.
> I don't believe I've ever seen an email from Andrew stopping a merge, and I
> shouldn't have, because I've never asked him to merge it. Being the
> perfectionist that I am, I've sought to get it as stable, reliable and
> comment-clean as I reasonably could before merging.
I believe I seen reply to that effect (saying "it is working and fast
is not enough for merge", or something like that.
Anyway, please Cc me on merge attempts...
Pavel
--
Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
