Hi. On Monday 20 February 2006 20:56, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Po 20-02-06 10:47:28, Matthias Hensler wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 01:53:33AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Only feature I can't do is "save whole pagecache"... and 14000 lines > > > of code for _that_ is a bit too much. I could probably patch my kernel > > > to dump pagecache to userspace, but I do not think it is worth the > > > effort. > > > > I do not think that Suspend 2 needs 14000 lines for that, the core is > > much smaller. But besides, _not_ saving the pagecache is a really _bad_ > > idea. I expect to have my system back after resume, in the same state I > > had left it prior to suspend. I really do not like it how it is done by > > Windows, it is just ugly to have a slowly responding system after > > resume, because all caches and buffers are gone. > > That's okay, swsusp already saves configurable ammount of pagecache. Really? How is it configured? Nigel -- See our web page for Howtos, FAQs, the Wiki and mailing list info. http://www.suspend2.net IRC: #suspend2 on Freenode
Attachment:
pgpO4YUjFVDbN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- Prev by Date: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 04/20] pspace: Allow multiple instaces of the process id namespace
- Previous by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Next by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Index(es):
 |