Re: [PATCH] Fix undefined symbols for nommu architecture

"Luke Yang" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Not so sure about this one.  Does randomize_va_space actually make sense in
>  > a nommu environment?  I guess we could load relocatable binaries into a
>  > randomised place, but I'm not sure that this is implemented?
>    No, it doesn't make sense now.  NOMMU architectures don't really use
>  it. I put it here just to avoid "undefined symbol" error.
>  >
>  > If no, then it would make more sense to do
>  >
>  >         #define randomize_va_space 0
>    Yes, this is much better.  Do I need to resend a new patch?

Yes please - I'm not set up to compile any nommu architectures.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Fix undefined symbols for nommu architecture
    • From: "Luke Yang" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix undefined symbols for nommu architecture
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Fix undefined symbols for nommu architecture
    • From: "Luke Yang" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix undefined symbols for nommu architecture
• Next by Date: [PATCH] Fix undefined symbols for nommu architecture --improved version
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Fix undefined symbols for nommu architecture
• Next by thread: [PATCH] Fix compile for CONFIG_SYSVIPC=n or CONFIG_SYSCTL=n
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]