On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 08:43:56PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Adam TlaĹ~Bka wrote:
> >one proper definition of the linux console. Maybe kernel developers should
> >prepare some most compatible and acceptable one.
> >I can post the one I am using today:
>
> ...of course, this one isn't like any of the variations I've seen.
> But you knew that. (Aside from the acs/enacs/rmacs/smacs changes,
> I'm curious what happened to ich/ich1).
They were removed because of possible incompatibility warning.
Maybe they should stay - I posted only currently used by me linux terminal
definition. As I said before there should be the official linux terminal
definition and description included with kernel sources because vt.c
in sources defines console behaviour.
Anyway acs, enacs, smacs and rmacs sequences are defined here
to stick to the controls interpretation used in vt.c
do_con_trol function and to get desired behaviour.
Regards
--
Adam Tlałka mailto:[email protected] ^v^ ^v^ ^v^
System & Network Administration Group ~~~~~~
Computer Center, Gdańsk University of Technology, Poland
PGP public key: finger [email protected]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
