Re: [PATCH 2/2] fix kill_proc_info() vs fork() theoretical race

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 12:20:08AM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> > >
> > > The other thing to think through is tkill on a thread/process while it
> > > is being created.  I believe that this is OK, since thread-specific
> > > kill must target a specific thread, so does not do the traversal.
> >
> > Also, tkill was not converted to use rcu_read_lock yet, it still
> > takes tasklist_lock, so I think it is safe.
> 
> I suspect that tkill will eventually need to avoid tasklist_lock...  ;-)

Ok, I am sending a couple of preparation patches for this.

Paul, I didn't beleive you when you started this work. Now I think
we can avoid tasklist AND cleanup the code in many places. I am glad
I was wrong.

Btw,
>
> firing off some steamroller tests on it.

Could you point me to these tests?

Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux