Hi!
> >Anyway, it means that suspend is still quite a hot topic, and that
> >is good. (Linus said that suspend-to-disk is basically for people
> >that can't get suspend-to-RAM to work, and after I got suspend-to-
> >RAM to work reliably here, I can see his point).
>
> I completely agree. My Mac PowerBook has had suspend-to-RAM for a
> long time; I shut the lid and about 3 seconds later it's asleep, open
> it and 3 seconds later it's awake. Leave it sleeping for a week on a
> full charge, come back to find it still asleep. I can even put it to
> sleep, remove a drained battery and put in a fresh one (it has a
> small internal 2-minute RAM battery), then wake it up and resume
> work. I'm curious though, what proportion of laptop hardware
> actually has support for suspend-to-RAM? (including hardware for
> which linux does not yet have support). What percent of that
> hardware _does_ have Linux support?
99%+ of notebooks can do s-t-ram, and perhaps 50% desktops.
Linux should work on 70% or so...
--
64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
