Re: time patches by Roman Zippel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> So personally I'd suggest to consider that code base. Options are eiher
> 1) to optimize/streamline what you think is too ugly
> 2) make the whole NTP lcok calibration optional if you think it's computationally
> too heavy (however, both GNOME and KDE hit the CPU much more than any of these
> changes)

Well, being less resource-hungry is similar to be less lethal than loaded gun.

Kernel time keeping should better have <0.1% cpu overhead.
				Pavel
-- 
64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms         

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux