Re: [PATCH 1/5] [pm] Fix locking of device suspend/resume functions

Patrick Mochel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This patch removes the unneeded down()/up() calls from
>  suspend_device() and resume_device(). Those functions
>  are already called under the dpm_sem, making this code
>  unconditionally deadlock in SMP kernels.

I've seen no reports of such deadlocks.  And I was testing swsusp on a
4-way this week?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] [pm] Fix locking of device suspend/resume functions
    • From: Patrick Mochel <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/5] [pm] Fix locking of device suspend/resume functions
    • From: Patrick Mochel <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Work From Home! 2000 dol p'r week!
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/5] [pm] Add state field to pm_message_t (to hold actual state device is in)
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/5] [pm] Fix locking of device suspend/resume functions
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/5] [pm] Fix locking of device suspend/resume functions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]