[PATCH] [TRIVIAL] Code comments update in NFS

[Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@gmail.com>]

Hi,

read_cache_mtime is no longer used in nfs_inode. This patch removes
references of read_cache_mtime in the code comments.

Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@gmail.com>


--- a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
@@ -118,8 +118,7 @@ struct nfs_inode {
 	unsigned long		cache_validity;		/* bit mask */

 	/*
-	 * read_cache_jiffies is when we started read-caching this inode,
-	 * and read_cache_mtime is the mtime of the inode at that time.
+	 * read_cache_jiffies is when we started read-caching this inode.
 	 * attrtimeo is for how long the cached information is assumed
 	 * to be valid. A successful attribute revalidation doubles
 	 * attrtimeo (up to acregmax/acdirmax), a failure resets it to
@@ -128,11 +127,6 @@ struct nfs_inode {
 	 * We need to revalidate the cached attrs for this inode if
 	 *
 	 *	jiffies - read_cache_jiffies > attrtimeo
-	 *
-	 * and invalidate any cached data/flush out any dirty pages if
-	 * we find that
-	 *
-	 *	mtime != read_cache_mtime
 	 */
 	unsigned long		read_cache_jiffies;
 	unsigned long		attrtimeo;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/