Hi,
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, john stultz wrote:
> > +u64 current_tick_length(void)
> > +{
> > + long delta_nsec;
> > +
> > + delta_nsec = tick_nsec + adjtime_adjustment() * 1000;
> > + return ((u64) delta_nsec << (SHIFT_SCALE - 10)) + time_adj;
> > +}
>
> You've got time_adj here, but you're not using what's been accumulated
> in time_phase, is that really ok?
>
>
> Other then that it looks ok to me. I know Roman is working on related
> code, so I CC'ed him on this.
I was only thinking about the possibility of increasing the precision
already, but that can still be done later.
Otherwise this function will only become simpler, so there's no real
problem. Actually it should even make NTP4 conversion easier, if ppc uses
this value instead of duplicating the calculation.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
