Re: Wrong number of core_siblings in sysfs for Athlon64 X2

On Thursday 16 February 2006 22:46, Jesper Juhl wrote:

> Obviously something is wrong, but I just can't seem to spot it.  Any clues?

It's a bitmap. 3 = 0b11 

-Andi


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wrong number of core_siblings in sysfs for Athlon64 X2
  - From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>

References:
- Wrong number of core_siblings in sysfs for Athlon64 X2
  - From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch 0/6] lightweight robust futexes: -V3
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions
Previous by thread: Wrong number of core_siblings in sysfs for Athlon64 X2
Next by thread: Re: Wrong number of core_siblings in sysfs for Athlon64 X2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]