Re: Wrong number of core_siblings in sysfs for Athlon64 X2

On Thursday 16 February 2006 22:46, Jesper Juhl wrote:

> Obviously something is wrong, but I just can't seem to spot it.  Any clues?

It's a bitmap. 3 = 0b11 

-Andi


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Wrong number of core_siblings in sysfs for Athlon64 X2
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Wrong number of core_siblings in sysfs for Athlon64 X2
    • From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 0/6] lightweight robust futexes: -V3
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.16-rc3: more regressions
• Previous by thread: Wrong number of core_siblings in sysfs for Athlon64 X2
• Next by thread: Re: Wrong number of core_siblings in sysfs for Athlon64 X2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]