On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 10:14:31AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 18:09 +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > where scsi_release() is the function called by the device model on the
> > last put of a scsi device.
> >
> > I guess is more or less what you're trying to do invasively via the
> > driver model.
>
> Yes ... except I think more than just SCSI has the problem (and we
> actually have it in more than one release function) so it seems like a
> good candidate for a general abstraction.
Maybe implementing it as a helper function would be the best and
simplest solution?
static void scsi_release(struct device *dev)
{
schedule_release_process(dev, scsi_release_process);
}
where schedule_release_process() contains more or less what I posted
in the previous mailing.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
