NeilBrown wrote:
Against 2.6.16-rc2-mm1. For inclusion in 2.6.16 please.
### Comments for Changeset
If a tag is set for a node being deleted from a radix_tree,
then that tag gets cleared from the parent of the node, even
if it is set for some siblings of the node begin deleted.
This patch changes the logic to include a test for any_tag_set similar
to the logic a little futher down. Care is taken to ensure that
'nr_cleared_tags' remains equals to the number of entries in the
'tags' array which are set to '0' (which means that this tag is not
set in the tree below pathp->node, and should be cleared at
pathp->node and possibly above.
Acked-by: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <[email protected]>
Linus FYI, I was able to modify the radix tree test harness to catch
the bug and can no longer trigger it after the fix. Resulting code
passes all other harness tests as well of course.
Should be applied ASAP. However, unlike Andrew I don't think this is
a filesystem corrupting bug (maybe he was talking about NFS?).
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]