On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > ... you've forgotten that now I've had to type "time_adjust_step" > twice. :P Damn, you're right. > Anyway, I don't mind changing it, if you think it's worth > pulling that little bit of code out into its own function. Sounds sane. Less duplication, and clearer code. Go wild. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] Provide an interface for getting the current tick length
- From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Provide an interface for getting the current tick length
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Provide an interface for getting the current tick length
- From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Provide an interface for getting the current tick length
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Provide an interface for getting the current tick length
- From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Provide an interface for getting the current tick length
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Provide an interface for getting the current tick length
- From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Provide an interface for getting the current tick length
- Prev by Date: Re: Possibly bug in radix_tree_delete, and fix.
- Next by Date: Re: Possibly bug in radix_tree_delete, and fix.
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Provide an interface for getting the current tick length
- Next by thread: Possibly bug in radix_tree_delete, and fix.
- Index(es):
 |