Carsten Otte <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > As long as we backout the bogus eer
> > patch before 2.6.16 all the cleanups and even the eckd ioctl fix
> > can wait. But don't put this crappy interface into 1.6.16 and thus
> > SLES10 so that applications start to rely on it.
> ACK: Given that a) both Horst and Christoph think the ioctl interface
> needs cleanup but proposed cleanup interfers with existing
> functionality (cmb), and b) later cleanup would change the
> user-interface of eer, we should rush neither the ioctl change nor
> eer into .16 until the maintainer is back afaics.
>
I don't have a patch in hand to purely back out the eer modeule. What I
have is
dasd-cleanup-dasd_ioctl.patch
dasd-cleanup-dasd_ioctl-fix.patch
dasd-add-per-disciple-ioctl-method.patch
dasd-merge-dasd_cmd-into-dasd_mod.patch
dasd-backout-dasd_eer-module.patch
dasd-kill-dynamic-ioctl-registration.patch
So what do we do?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
