Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)

Rob Landley <[email protected]> writes:

> On Wednesday 15 February 2006 1:31 pm, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>> once.
>
> Yup.  Apparently with SAS, the controllers are far more likely to fail than 
> the drives.

I think the actual idea (or one of them) is to have two machines
connected to each drive, in a hot-standby configuration.  This has
been done for a long time with parallel SCSI, where both machines have
controllers on the bus.

-Doug
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
    • From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
    • From: jerome lacoste <[email protected]>
  • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
    • From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
  • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
    • From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)
  • Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
    • From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: + acpi_os_acquire_object-gfp_kernel-called-with-irqs.patch added to -mm tree
• Next by Date: Re: RFC: disk geometry via sysfs
• Previous by thread: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
• Next by thread: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]