Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 14:09 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
shrink_zone and do_shrink_zone don't really say any more to me than
shrink_zone and shrink_cache.
I know not everybody believes in a plugable reclaim policy, but that is
what I'm building. And from that POV I'd rather not see the
active/inactive names get used here.
active/inactive is what we have now. If you manage to get a pluggable
reclaim policy merged then I assure you, renaming these yet again will
be the least of your worries :)
My vote goes to Coywolf's suggestion.
What was that?
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
