Re: [patch] make sysctl_overcommit_memory enumeration sensible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 01:05:59AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Coywolf Qi Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I see system admins often confused when they sysctl vm.overcommit_memory.
> > This patch makes overcommit_memory enumeration sensible.
> > 
> > 0 - no overcommit
> > 1 - always overcommit
> > 2 - heuristic overcommit (default)
> > 
> > I don't feel this would break any userspace scripts.
> 
> eh?   If any such scripts exist, they'll break.
> 
> Confused.
> 

That's a corner case. Let'em break and fix.  Otherwise, users will
be confused. Even they get it right, after some weeks they'll have
to re-read the doc. A logical user interface is important to human.
-- 
Coywolf Qi Hunt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux